We're very pleased that you want to get in touch with us. Please fill in the form below:



or   Close this form  
Some content

Peter Pilgrim :: Java Champion :: Digital Developer Architect

I design Java EE and Scala software solutions for the blue-chip clients and private sector

Hey all! Thanks for visiting. I provide fringe benefits to interested readers: checkout consultancy, training or mentorship Please make enquiries by email or call +44 (0)7397 067 658.

Due to the Off-Payroll Working plan for the UK government, unfortunately, I am no longer accepting standard GOV.UK contract engagements for the public sector. Please enquire for further information.

The end of contracting at GOV.UK for the foreseeable future

28 November 2016 Comments off

4 minutes

724

The Government Digital Service was created way back in 2010 based on the ideas and the report from Dame Martha Lane Fox. It was supposed to be Agile, faster and efficient and cost effective for the UK. Whereas previous big projects eventually cost the tax payers scores of millions of British pounds, if not hundreds of millions, the new GOV.UK allowed smaller outfits and organisations a chance to tender and bring in contractors and consultants to build a better digital service for the UK citizens. This was the grand idea. However, from now on independent contractors, like myself, will not be taking the risk of retrospective taxation.

(For practising professional IT contractors this will be already old news)

Why is this so? This is because the HMRC (Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs) through the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Autumn Statement will be introducing changes in the next tax year that making contracting no longer viable for any engagements in GOV.UK and other relevant departments that are indirectly controlled by the government like the BBC.

Here is the summary from QDOS Consulting:

“From 6th April the responsibility for determining IR35 status in public sector engagements will shift from the contractor to the party paying them, which will usually be the recruitment agency. This means the agency will also be liable if they decide a contractor can work outside IR35 and their decision is subsequently challenged by HMRC.”

Source: QDOS

In a word, the recruitment agency (or consultancy) would be footing the extra bill for paying additional tax revenue, or equally like contractor rates will be forced down, if agencies don’t take the hit. Which ever way you square this, the prognosis is financially unhealthy. Throw in to the fire, the economic uncertainty around the economy, including Britain’s decision to leave the European Union, we can see no nice results.

Given HMRC’s intentions to process more cases inside the public sector against possible consultants and contractors, the result of the rules change will cause additional expenditure, perhaps estimated up to 40% on current contracting rates, if say considering London, and this is represents a conflict of interest.

“HMRC are convinced that there is widespread ‘non-compliance’ in the public sector, estimating that 90% of ‘off payroll’ workers are not paying tax correctly. Given they do not have the resources to adequately police IR35, they have decided a significant change is required.”

Source: QDOS

Here is a quote from Contractor Weekly:

“The announcement is in response to feedback to HMRC’s consultation document, ‘Off-payroll working in the public sector: reform of the intermediaries legislation’ that closed in August, and reflects the fact that a worker will no longer bear the administrative burden of deciding whether the IR35 rules apply. This is a feeble excuse as the flat rate reduction allows for the general expense of running a business, such as training costs as well as assessing employment status. The more likely reason for its abolition is that it would have made payroll calculations that little more difficult.”

Source: Contractor Weekly

I have now decided not to take on any public sector work for any governmental control departments like the GOV.UK for the foreseeable future.

I’m extremely pessimistic that contractor rates would rise, even 10%, over the next year to cover the additional cost of the impact after 5th April 2017. Sadly, this conclusion is inevitable, despite the fact there are plenty of challenging technology projects including adaptive software development, M/SOA, Java EE, Scala, PHP, JavaScript, AWS, Azure, UX and UI going on over there at GOV.UK. It’s just that I could no longer afford to ever be a part it with the incoming HMRC rule sets. It means almost certainly the large consultancies will be back at it, controlling the projects, helping the GOV.UK as they can afford to pay. Whilst the tiny consultancies and the independents will be squeezed out over time.

28th November 2016
+PP+

+++ UPDATE +++

On the 5th December 2016, the UK government published a technical note about Off Payroll Working in the Public Sector of the Intermediaries Legislation. If you are practising IT contractor, I believe, it is very well worth reading the Rebecca example. The technical note clearly states the IR35 liability of a public service contractor if, indeed, their contract engagement means financial payments on the 6th April 2017 or afterwards.

CotE Autumn Statement 2016

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Contents of this blog entry are under copyright © 2017 by Peter Pilgrim and associates. For enquiries after republishing, please contact us for permission. All requests for syndicated content will be ignored /dev/null, consider yourself warned!

I help to design, create and build JVM components and services that are behind popular e-commerce websites.

My Blurb

Please get in touch , directly, to establish hire availability, contract & consulting opportunities.

Speaking at Your Conference

Contact by invitation

What Peter Does

Contact